Labyrinth City: Pierre the Maze Detective

A Storybook You Can Get Lost In

by Darjeeling

Adventure gameSteamAndroidSwitch$11.99

Reviewed by the Rankeno RPG & Adventure DeskUpdated Oct 2026

Labyrinth City: Pierre the Maze Detective is an Adventure game for Steam, Android and Nintendo Switch. Beautiful to look at and genuinely relaxing, but hard to recommend to anyone wanting actual challenge. It scores 6.6 out of 10 — Mixed.

6.6Mixed#517 of 597 Adventure games

How it scored How we score

  • Design8.0
  • Innovation5.5
  • Value6.5
  • Utility6.0

In one line

A gorgeous, hand-drawn love letter to the Where’s Waldo era whose maze puzzles barely qualify as puzzles.

Released Jun 22, 2021

The verdict

Beautiful to look at and genuinely relaxing, but hard to recommend to anyone wanting actual challenge.

What we liked

  • Breathtaking, dense hand-drawn art
  • Hundreds of delightful animated interactions
  • Relaxing, zero-stress design
  • Charming jazz soundtrack

What could be better

  • Maze puzzles are trivially easy
  • Short, minimal replay value
  • No stakes or fail state to hold tension
  • Thin story, controller navigation is fiddly

Is it for you?

Best for

  • Cozy-game devotees who prize atmosphere over challenge.
  • Parents and kids looking for a safe, gorgeous game to share.
  • Nostalgic adults raised on Where's Waldo and the hidden-picture books of that era.
  • Not for anyone hunting a real puzzle or lasting mechanical depth.

More reviewed in Adventure

Overview

Some games want to test you. Labyrinth City: Pierre the Maze Detective wants to slow your heart rate. Developed by Darjeeling and adapted from the bestselling children’s picture books by Japanese art studio IC4DESIGN, this is less a puzzle game than an animated coffee-table book with a controller jack. You play Pierre, the titular maze detective, chasing a thief named Mr. X across Opera City after he swipes the Maze Stone—a magic relic that warps the world into tangled labyrinths. It’s a plot pitched at a seven-year-old, and that’s fine. The story is scaffolding for the art.

And the art is the entire proposition here. IC4DESIGN made its name packing countless tiny, hilarious vignettes into single illustrations, and Darjeeling’s adaptation preserves that density while adding motion. Ten hand-drawn double-page spreads unfold like the pages of a physical book, each stuffed with hundreds of interactive characters, objects, and gags that spring to life when you poke them.

Positioning-wise, this sits in a specific and underserved niche: the cozy game. It competes less with other puzzlers and more with the likes of Unpacking, A Little to the Left, and the search-and-find shelf at your local bookstore. It launched to a warm critical reception—Metacritic sits at 81—and the consensus is telling: critics adored the presentation and shrugged at the difficulty. That tension defines the whole experience. This is a beautiful thing to look at and a nearly frictionless thing to play, and whether that’s a feature or a flaw depends entirely on what you walked in wanting. Priced at $11.99 and paced as a short, warm evening, it knows exactly what it is.

Key features

  • Hand-Drawn Interactive Spreads: Ten sprawling, illustrated levels—each a living picture-book page with hundreds of animated interactions triggered by simple exploration.
  • Search-and-Find Collectibles: Dozens of hidden objects, trophies, and mini-games tucked into the margins, rewarding the players who actually stop to look.
  • Stress-Free Design: No fail states, no timers, no penalties. Intuitive navigation, full controller support, and offline play make it a genuine unwind-machine.

Analysis

The Gameplay Loop

The core loop is disarmingly simple: enter a maze, trace a path from Pierre to the exit, and try not to get distracted along the way. Except getting distracted is the game. The maze-solving—the ostensible verb in “maze detective”—is the weakest part of the whole package, and it’s not close.

Here’s the problem. A maze is only interesting if the solution isn’t obvious, and these solutions are almost always obvious. The valid path is usually visible at a glance, and even when it isn’t, there’s no cost to guessing. You can’t lose. You can’t get stuck in any meaningful sense. The mazes are a formality, a thin gameplay excuse to keep you moving your eyes across another dazzling illustration. Anyone over the age of ten will solve most spreads with barely a pause for actual navigation.

But—and this matters—the game seems to know this. The real loop isn’t solving; it’s noticing. The exit takes seconds to find; the design banks on the next stretch of time being spent ignoring it in favor of a tiny chef juggling fish, a hidden object glinting in a fountain, or a mini-game buried behind a shop window. The collectible hunt is where the design earns its keep. Each spread hides objects to find, and the hunt reframes the whole screen: suddenly every one of those hundreds of elements is a potential clue, and the dense, chaotic illustrations flip from decoration to playground.

Onboarding and Friction

Onboarding is effectively nonexistent, and that’s the right call. You touch a thing, it wiggles or chirps, you understand the game. There’s zero onboarding friction—no tutorial wall, no mechanics to master. The whole experience is built around low commitment, and it delivers a relaxing, stress-free flow. This is a game built for playing with a toddler on your lap or half-asleep at midnight.

The cost of that frictionlessness is stakes. Without a fail state, without difficulty, there’s nothing to overcome, and for a certain kind of player that hollows out the entire experience. The satisfaction here is aesthetic and completionist, not mechanical. If you need a game to challenge you, this will feel like flipping through a very pretty catalog.

Length and Replayability

Ten spreads make for a short campaign, and once you’ve seen them, you’ve seen them. Replayability is thin—the mazes don’t randomize, the objects don’t move, and the joy of first discovery doesn’t survive a second pass. This is a one-and-done experience, and it’s priced and paced like one. That’s not a betrayal of its design; it’s the honest length of a good picture book. You don’t re-read Where’s Waldo for the twist.

Visuals & performance

This is the reason to buy the game, full stop. IC4DESIGN’s illustration work is staggeringly detailed, and the adaptation treats it with the reverence it deserves. Every spread rewards zooming in—the density of jokes, references, and micro-narratives baked into each scene is remarkable, and the added animation gives the static book art a warmth it never had on paper. The whimsical background jazz deserves a specific shout-out; it’s the aural equivalent of a warm cup of tea, looping without ever grating.

The UI stays out of the way, which is exactly what a game like this needs. No cluttered HUD, no menus fighting for attention—just the page and your cursor. Performance should be a non-issue by design: a 2D game of this scope is light on hardware, and the whole pitch is “look at this beautiful thing,” so anything less than smooth pan-and-zoom would sink it. The design leaves little room for technical stumbles, which is exactly where it wants to be.

Platform nuances

The game ships on Steam, Android, and Nintendo Switch, and the platform changes the experience.

Android is the natural home. This is a touch-first design in its bones—search-and-find is a fingertip verb, and tapping directly on a hidden chef or dragging Pierre through a maze feels immediate and correct. It’s also the ideal cozy commute format.

Switch is a close second, and arguably the best of both worlds: dock it for the big-screen art, or play handheld in touch mode for that tablet-like intimacy. The controller support is competent, though navigating a dense 2D plane with a stick is inherently clumsier than pointing at it.

Steam is where the friction shows. Mouse-and-keyboard works fine, but controller navigation on a static illustration is fiddly—hunting for a tiny object with an analog stick is slower and less satisfying than a tap or a click. On PC, use the mouse. The art scales beautifully to a big monitor, but this design was born on a touchscreen, and it never fully forgets that.

Final verdict

Labyrinth City: Pierre the Maze Detective is a triumph of presentation wrapped around a wash of gameplay, and for most players that trade doesn’t balance out. It sets out to be a playable picture book—a warm, beautiful, low-stakes place to spend an evening—and it nails that brief with real craft. But the mazes are an afterthought, the campaign is over almost as soon as it starts, and there’s nothing here to hold anyone who wants a game to push back. Walk in expecting a puzzle game and the disappointment is immediate; walk in wanting nothing more than to slow down and look at something lovely, and it delivers exactly that. As a piece of interactive art, it’s easy to admire. As a game, it’s a tough sell at $11.99 for anyone but the coziest of cozy-game devotees.

Reviewed by the Rankeno RPG & Adventure Desk. Scores are out of 10; the overall score is the desk’s editorial judgement, informed by the four sub-scores above. How we review

Your rating for Labyrinth City: Pierre the Maze Detective:
Was this helpful?

Are you the developer of Labyrinth City: Pierre the Maze Detective?

Submit for review or ask about a placement. Paid $49 · expedited $149

Submit your product
Embed this score badge on your site

Embed this review badge

Paste this snippet on your site to show your Rankeno score. The link back to rankeno.com is a normal followed link — no redirect, no ad tracking.

Store facts (checked Oct 2026)

Store ratings
1,914

Quick facts

Developer
Darjeeling
Released
Jun 22, 2021
Price
$11.99
Genres
Adventure, Casual, Indie
Metacritic
81

Questions about Labyrinth City: Pierre the Maze Detective

Is Labyrinth City: Pierre the Maze Detective worth it?

Labyrinth City: Pierre the Maze Detective is a triumph of presentation wrapped around a wash of gameplay, and for most players that trade doesn't balance out. Our editors scored Labyrinth City: Pierre the Maze Detective 6.6 out of 10, which puts it in our Mixed band.

Why does Labyrinth City: Pierre the Maze Detective score 6.6 out of 10?

With a score of 6.6 out of 10, Labyrinth City: Pierre the Maze Detective lands in our Mixed band. Design is its strongest category at 8.0 out of 10. Innovation is the weakest at 5.5.

What do our editors like most about Labyrinth City: Pierre the Maze Detective?

Breathtaking, dense hand-drawn art. Hundreds of delightful animated interactions.

What do our editors say is Labyrinth City: Pierre the Maze Detective's biggest weakness?

Maze puzzles are trivially easy. Short, minimal replay value.

If you liked Labyrinth City: Pierre the Maze Detective

Similar picks our editors rate highly.

Get our verdicts weekly

One email a week with our newest reviews and the top-ranked picks across apps and games.

We use your email only for this weekly roundup. See our privacy policy.