The Gardens Between

Grief, Wrapped in Fireflies

by The Voxel Agents

Adventure gameiOSSteamAndroidSwitch$19.99

Reviewed by the Rankeno Puzzle & Casual DeskUpdated Oct 2026

The Gardens Between is an Adventure game for iOS, Steam, Android and Nintendo Switch. It's short, gentle, and gorgeous—and its most radical idea isn't the puzzles, it's the refusal to let the player fail. Solid, but built for a specific audience. It scores 7.6 out of 10 — Good.

7.6Good#315 of 597 Adventure games

How it scored How we score

  • Design8.0
  • Innovation8.0
  • Value6.0
  • Utility6.0

In one line

A wordless, wistful puzzle-box about the moment two childhood friends realize they’re growing apart.

Released Sep 19, 2018

The verdict

It’s short, gentle, and gorgeous—and its most radical idea isn’t the puzzles, it’s the refusal to let the player fail. Solid, but built for a specific audience.

What we liked

  • A mechanic where the gameplay is the theme
  • Wordless storytelling that lands emotionally
  • Striking storybook art and reactive Tim Shiel score
  • Zero-friction, no-fail design invites everyone in

What could be better

  • Genuinely short—one sitting, maybe two
  • Puzzles rarely challenge; near-zero difficulty curve
  • Islands are beautiful but static, little to explore
  • Low replay value once the story is known

Is it for you?

Best for

  • *Players who want to feel* something in an evening,** not conquer a challenge.
  • Commuters and wind-down players on iOS, Android, or Switch handheld.
  • *Fans of Monument Valley, Gris, and Journey***—short, artful, emotional experiences.
  • Newcomers and non-gamers who can be handed a controller without a tutorial fight.

More reviewed in Adventure

Overview

Most puzzle games hand you a problem and dare you to fail. The Gardens Between does something quieter and, frankly, braver: it hands you a feeling and trusts you to sit with it.

This is a single-player adventure-puzzle game from The Voxel Agents, a Melbourne studio that pivoted away from mobile hits toward something more personal. That gamble shows. The premise is simple to describe and hard to shake. Two best friends—Arina and Frendt—tumble into a chain of dreamlike island gardens, each one a floating diorama built from the oversized flotsam of a shared childhood. Old TVs. Umbrellas. Fairy lights. A treehouse. The pair climbs each island to deposit a glowing orb at its summit, and with every peak, another fragment of their friendship clicks into place.

Here’s the twist that defines the whole thing: the player doesn’t control the characters. They control time. Scrub it forward and the friends walk up the path; rewind it and they retreat, while the world rewinds with them—mostly. Certain objects, certain lights, certain mechanisms don’t obey the rewind. Learning what bends to the player’s will and what doesn’t is the entire game.

Positioned against the crowded “cozy narrative puzzler” shelf—your Monument Valleys, your Grises—this one stakes out a specific emotional register. It isn’t trying to dazzle with scale or difficulty. It’s an interactive short story, brief enough to finish in a sitting or two, priced and paced accordingly. That brevity is the point and, for some players, the problem. More on that later. What matters up front is that Voxel Agents built a mechanic that isn’t decorative. The time control is the theme. Memory, after all, is the one thing everyone rewinds and never quite gets back the same way.

Key features

  • Time-as-controller mechanic: Arina and Frendt are never moved directly. The flow of time is dragged back and forth, and the friends—and the world—respond. Puzzles are solved by finding the exact temporal window where objects, light, and characters align.
  • Wordless environmental storytelling: No text, no dialogue, no HUD. The entire narrative of a fading childhood friendship is told through dioramas, object placement, and animation. It asks to be read, not told.
  • Zero-friction design: There is no fail state, no timer, no death, no penalty. The game removes every traditional stressor to protect its emotional tone.
  • Handcrafted island vignettes: A compact set of surreal islands, each a self-contained puzzle and a snapshot of a specific memory, built in a warm storybook art style.
  • Ambient score by Tim Shiel: A soft, reactive soundtrack that swells and recedes with the scrubbing of time, doing quiet heavy lifting on the emotional front.

Analysis

The Gameplay Loop

The loop is elegant precisely because it’s so small. The player arrives at the base of an island and scrubs time forward. The friends begin their climb. Something blocks them—a gate, a gap, a monstrous shadow, a light that needs redirecting. So time is rewound, the world is watched in reverse, and the hunt begins for the object that doesn’t reset. That object is the lever.

A crumbled bridge might reassemble when rewound past its collapse. A firefly-orb Arina carries can be handed to Frendt, banked at a specific moment, then reclaimed later—the friends’ cooperation literally encoded into the timeline. The genius stroke is the decoupling of the two characters from a single timeline. Frendt often operates mechanisms that alter the environment while Arina moves through it, meaning the player is constantly juggling two states of the same rewound world. When it clicks, it produces a very particular flavor of satisfaction—not the triumphant aha! of a hard logic puzzle, but the softer oh, of course of watching two things fall into rhythm.

Let’s be honest about the difficulty, because it’s the game’s most contested trait. These puzzles are gentle. Most are built to yield quickly. A handful in the back third introduce genuine second-guessing—layered light mechanics, sequencing that requires banking an object across multiple rewinds—but nobody should come to this expecting to be stumped. The onboarding friction is near zero, and the design intentionally keeps the ceiling low. Anyone arriving from The Witness or Baba Is You expecting to be humbled will likely coast through and wonder what the fuss is about.

But that critique misreads the intent. The puzzles aren’t the meal. They’re the pacing mechanism for the story. Each solve is a beat in a narrative that has no words to lean on, and the low resistance keeps the player inside the emotional current instead of yanking them out to grind on a solution. Difficulty here would be a bug, not a feature. A wall would break the spell.

The Interface

There barely is one, and that’s a triumph of restraint. Scrub to move time. A single button to interact. That’s the vocabulary. The absence of a HUD, a hint system, or any on-screen guidance keeps eyes on the diorama, which is exactly where the storytelling lives. Form and function aren’t fighting here—they’re holding hands.

The Emotional Engine

This is where the game earns its reputation. The story of Arina and Frendt is told entirely through implication: a treehouse, a growing distance, a specific melancholy that anyone who’s watched a childhood friendship quietly dissolve will recognize in their gut. It doesn’t manipulate with a swelling orchestra and a death scene. It accumulates, image by image, until the final islands land with a weight the runtime shouldn’t be able to support. That it does so without a single line of dialogue is the real achievement—not the puzzles, but the confidence to trust the player to feel something unprompted.

Visuals & performance

The art direction is the headline, and it delivers. That storybook style—soft volumetric light, deep twilight blues punctuated by warm firefly gold—turns every island into something worth photographing. The dioramas are staged like theater sets, and the oversized-object motif (a childhood remembered as giant, looming things) is both a visual hook and a thematic one. This is skeuomorphism as emotion: the world is literally built from the debris of memory.

Tim Shiel’s score deserves equal billing. It’s ambient without being wallpaper, reactive to time-scrubbing so that rewinding feels musical. Sound and mechanic are welded together.

Technically, this is a small, tightly scoped game with no open world to choke on—a 2D-styled diorama puzzler of this scale is light on hardware by design, and there’s nothing in the architecture that asks much of any platform. The one real critique isn’t performance—it’s density. Those handcrafted islands are stunning but static. There’s little to explore within them beyond the puzzle’s critical path, so the beauty is admired rather than inhabited.

Platform nuances

This game was born to be played with a finger, and the platform math reflects that.

  • iOS / Android: The best fit for the mechanic. Scrubbing time by dragging a thumb across the screen is intimate and tactile—physically pushing the world forward and back. On a phone or tablet, it becomes the ideal commute or wind-down game. The short runtime and no-fail design suit fragmented, on-the-go play perfectly.
  • Nintendo Switch: The sweet spot for many. Handheld mode recreates the touch intimacy via the analog stick with almost no loss, while docked play throws that gorgeous art onto a TV. If one definitive version is wanted, this is it.
  • Steam / PC: The most powerful hardware and the least natural control scheme. Mouse-and-keyboard or a gamepad both map cleanly to time-scrubbing via a stick or a horizontal drag, but there’s a faint sense of using a sledgehammer to hang a picture. It should look spectacular at high resolution. It just doesn’t need the horsepower.

No version is inherently broken. But the further the setup gets from a touchscreen, the more the game is admired rather than held.

Final verdict

The Gardens Between is not a demanding game, and grading it strictly as a puzzler means docking it for a soft challenge curve and a runtime that ends before the night does. Do that, though, and the point gets missed.

This is an emotional artifact with puzzle mechanics as its delivery system. The decision to strip out failure, text, and time pressure isn’t laziness—it’s a thesis. Remove every obstacle between the player and the feeling, and trust that the feeling is strong enough to carry the experience alone. It mostly does. The last stretch of islands carries more weight than a game this brief about childhood friendship has any right to, and it does it in complete silence.

The knocks are real. It’s short, it’s easy, and it’s built to be played once. But some things aren’t meant to be replayed. They’re meant to be remembered. We rate it a Good—solid but unremarkable in ways that matter—and recommend it to the right audience: on a phone, tablet, or a Switch, for an evening. Take the evening. Let it rewind a little.

Reviewed by the Rankeno Puzzle & Casual Desk. Scores are out of 10; the overall score is the desk’s editorial judgement, informed by the four sub-scores above. How we review

Your rating for The Gardens Between:
Was this helpful?

Are you the developer of The Gardens Between?

Submit for review or ask about a placement. Paid $49 · expedited $149

Submit your product
Embed this score badge on your site

Embed this review badge

Paste this snippet on your site to show your Rankeno score. The link back to rankeno.com is a normal followed link — no redirect, no ad tracking.

Store facts (checked Oct 2026)

Store ratings
2,365

Quick facts

Developer
The Voxel Agents
Released
Sep 19, 2018
Price
$19.99
Genres
Adventure, Indie, Puzzle
Age rating
4+
Store rating
4.8 ★ · 3,680 ratings
Metacritic
80

Questions about The Gardens Between

Is The Gardens Between worth it?

The Gardens Between is not a demanding game, and grading it strictly as a puzzler means docking it for a soft challenge curve and a runtime that ends before the night does. Our editors scored The Gardens Between 7.6 out of 10, which puts it in our Good band.

Why does The Gardens Between score 7.6 out of 10?

With a score of 7.6 out of 10, The Gardens Between lands in our Good band. Design is its strongest category at 8.0 out of 10. Value is the weakest at 6.0.

What do our editors like most about The Gardens Between?

A mechanic where the gameplay is the theme. Wordless storytelling that lands emotionally.

What do our editors say is The Gardens Between's biggest weakness?

Genuinely short—one sitting, maybe two. Puzzles rarely challenge; near-zero difficulty curve.

If you liked The Gardens Between

Similar picks our editors rate highly.

Get our verdicts weekly

One email a week with our newest reviews and the top-ranked picks across apps and games.

We use your email only for this weekly roundup. See our privacy policy.